?

Log in

No account? Create an account

[icon] High-larious - Patti
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.
View:Website (pattib.org).

Security:
Subject:High-larious
Time:12:46 pm
A while back I signed up for the American Family Association mailing list, largely because I was curious to see what they were getting up-in-arms about. Today's missive cracks me up! Apparently they're throwing a tantrum because the stimulus bill blocks universities from using stimulus funds for renovating religious buildings, and somehow this amounts to discrimination against people of faith.

My favorite phrase is "holy anger".
February 9, 2009

Dear (me),

President Obama's stimulus bill discriminates against Christians and people of faith. The stimulus bans universities and colleges from using funds to renovate buildings where students engage in "religious worship."

U.S. Senator Jim DeMint made the following statement after Democrats voted 43-54 against his amendment to strike from the economic stimulus bill language that discriminates against people of faith. Senator DeMint's amendment would have eliminated a provision that bans any university or college receiving restoration funds, from allowing "sectarian instruction" or "religious worship" within the facility. This would in effect bar use of campus buildings for groups like Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Campus Crusade for Christ, Catholic Student Ministries, Hillel and other religious organizations.

"This is a direct attack on students of faith, and I'm outraged Democrats are using an economic stimulus bill to promote discrimination," said Sen. DeMint. "Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for siding with the ACLU over millions of students of faith. These students simply want equal access to public facilities, which is their constitutional right. This hostility toward religion must end. Those who voted for this discrimination are standing in the schoolhouse door to keep people of faith from entering any campus building renovated by this bill.

"This is now an ACLU stimulus designed to trigger lawsuits designed to intimidate religious organizations across the nation. This language is so vague, it's not clear if students can even pray in a dorm room renovated with this funding since that is a form of 'religious worship.' If this provision remains in the bill, it will have a chilling effect on students of faith in America" he continued.

"Our culture cannot survive without faith and our nation cannot survive without freedom. This provision is an assault against both. It's un-American and it's unconstitutional. Intolerant and it's intolerable."

This funding restriction is unconstitutional. In the 2001 Good News Club v. Milford Central School Supreme Court decision, the court ruled that restricting religious speech within the context of public shared-use facilities (or schools) is unconstitutional.

Pages 164-165 of the stimulus contain the following prohibitions on the use of $3.5 billion available for renovation of public or private college and university facilities.

(2) PROHIBITED USES OF FUNDS. No funds awarded under this section may be used for - (C) modernization, renovation, or repair of facilities (i) used for sectarian instruction, religious worship, or a school or department of divinity; or (ii) in which a substantial portion of the functions of the facilities are subsumed in a religious mission; or construction of new facilities.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich urges Christian activists and other conservatives to e-mail and call their representative and senators demanding that the language discriminating against people of faith be removed.

Gingrich feels that if Christian activists would have enough courage and holy anger to e-mail and call their representatives and senators, a number of Democrats would vote no on final passage. We should demand that this anti-religious provision be removed.

Christians have not expressed enough outrage focused on the concept that people of faith are being taken advantage of by the stimulus bill during a time of crisis. They are being stolen from them when they are down and out and looking in good faith to the government for help. Instead of the stimulus we need, the liberals are getting the pork that they want -- for themselves, their families, and their friends. They are pickpockets and thieves preying on the down and out.

It's as if the Good Samaritan had come over to the man who was robbed and left for dead, bent over, and reached for his wallet and ran on his way instead of helping. It's like the looter who takes advantage of a natural disaster to steal."

The liberals are taking advantage of a crisis, just like Rahm Emanuel said. His quote: "'You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,' Rahm Emanuel, Mr. Obama's new chief of staff, told a Wall Street Journal conference of top corporate chief executives this week." - WSJ, Nov. 21, 2008.

America is in crisis, and the liberals are looting America's future to pay off their special interests. This is corruption of the highest order. E-mail and call your representative and two senators today!
Take Action!

Send an e-mail and call your representative and two senators today! Tell them to remove the language discriminating against people of faith. In addition, please take the time to call your representative and two senators. The phone number where you can reach both your representative and two senators is 202-224-3121.


Thank you for caring enough to get involved. If you feel our efforts are worthy of support, would you consider making a small tax-deductible contribution to help us continue?

Sincerely,

Don

Donald E. Wildmon,
Founder and Chairman
American Family Association
comments: Leave a comment Previous Entry Share Next Entry


sfogarty
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-10 08:55 pm (UTC)
While I don't see it as discrimination, it does seem to be very broad. As far as I can read it, if there's a religious campus group that holds occasional prayer groups, buildings used to house them cannot receive funds. Since most buildings on most campus' are "open" after 6pm, and religious campus groups could use any of them, it would seem to bar any building from receiving funding.
(Reply) (Thread)


whipartist
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-10 08:57 pm (UTC)
Yeah, it could certainly use the word "primarily" in a strategic location.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)


stevecohen
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-10 09:25 pm (UTC)
Oooooh - NO - NO WEASEL WORDS - you might as well not have the provision.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

(Deleted comment)

jellymillion
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-11 10:31 am (UTC)
That seems to be the case. I suppose it might be a little harsh on seminaries, who are really going to struggle...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)


tiurin
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-10 10:08 pm (UTC)
Gotta love the Christian persecution complex.
(Reply) (Thread)


ronsrants
Link:(Link)
Time:2009-02-11 01:06 am (UTC)
Yay South Carolina! Once again humiliating me in Public.

-R
(Reply) (Thread)

[icon] High-larious - Patti
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.
View:Website (pattib.org).