?

Log in

No account? Create an account

[icon] Patti
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.
View:Website (pattib.org).

Security:
Subject:About the "bank error"
Time:10:14 am
So here's what happened with the "bank error" situation...

I recently got a $5K hiring bonus at work when a friend of mine joined the company. They double-paid me. I notified payroll, who acknowledged the problem and said that they'd take care of it. It's been over a month, though, and it hasn't been handled.

Just before posting that poll I remembered it. "Oh yeah, I should nag them about that." That sent me down the path of pondering such errors, and where the ethical boundaries were for letting it slide.

For me, the impact that the mistake will have on the erring party make a huge difference in how I handle it. If a large entity makes a small error in my favor, I'm unlikely to care much. Like most of the respondents, I'll try harder if it's a large error, a small entity, or someone that I regularly do business with. I might not try at all if my bank made a one dollar error in my favor. I'd definitely point it out if Chop Bar (the restaurant in my building) forgot to charge me for a cocktail and I noticed, but I might not do so for a glass of iced tea.

JP pointed out a case of a large business entity making large mistakes in his favor. I similarly will not correct them in that particular case.

If it's my mistake, the equation changes somewhat. I try harder for those.


The question I don't know the answer to... would there be a point at which I just give up trying to return $5K to my company? Obviously, one attempt was not enough for me. If I try three times and fail, have I done enough? I don't know.
comments: Leave a comment Previous Entry Share Next Entry

loser_variable
Link:(Link)
Time:2011-11-01 03:10 am (UTC)
Any size company, for any amount, if you keep it that's stealing. Don't get me wrong, I would probably do it in most cases (I also have a heart for the little guy), I just wouldn't delude myself about what I was doing. It's not that we're good people, not hardly, we just efficiently apply risk/reward very well. And that's why poor people will rob you at gun point while we "upstanding" folks wouldn't - they have almost nothing to lose. We're not any different. If we can take something that isn't ours under an excusable or minimal risk situation, booyah! People are people. I'm pretty loathsome. I know it, at least, and I'm not sure if that's good or bad. I'm pretty full of self-loathing.

See Julian Baggini for some excellent active vs. passive ethical quizzes.
(Reply) (Thread)

[icon] Patti
View:Recent Entries.
View:Archive.
View:Friends.
View:Profile.
View:Website (pattib.org).